This work is dedicated to the Public Domain.

[[elsewhere]]

¶ for me this is mnjach a piece of conceptual art. and turner prize is fckuing dicriminative. (01:36)

---

potiho :

a lahko reccess kakssno vecc na to temo,
mi ni ccisto jasno kaj si hotela recci in zakaj?
si pacc povedal svoje na zelo "direkten" in "emotiven"
naccin, me zanima na kassen naccin je "turner prize"
recimo vezana nate itd ?

[: //]

melon :

turner prize je name vezana kot del celotne arhitekture, ki me obkroza....pac tako kot je cel zunanji svet vezan name in na katerega sem jaz pripeta. samo toliko in nic vec zaenkrat.

se mi pa zdi problematicna nagrada, ker vem da je v londonu se ogromno drugih iniciativ, institucij in umetnic ali umetnikov, ki delajo na podrocju sodobnih ustvarjalnih praks, ki mogoce niso studirali na goldsmithu so pa ravnotako aktivni in njihovo delo je za druzbo prav tako pomembno. izbor se mi zdi nekako prevec britanski, ceprav se zavedam da smo v britaniji, ampak, v um.zg. in tudi vse bolj v eu je stanje stvari tako, da je umetnnost nekega podrocja pac vsa ki tam nastaja. seveda bi se o tem dalo diskutirat.

ne vem. pac sem ena izmed mnogih, ki nisem fenica turner priza.
nekaj mi tle ne gre. ne gre za neposredno diskriminacijo, ampak samo za neko pozo, ki ima enako metodo dela.

[: //]

pac pac :

lpac pac.

:))

[: //]

potiho :

good enough
;)

[: //]

luk :

britain position was, is and will always be problematic. as most of empire-al nations' positions. so turner prize can be a good example of this kind of british stance. however, some brits are not brits "in their heart" so generalisation is not in the place. furthermore, some brits carry the actions of emperial actions of their ancestors. and try to correct this.

established and institutionionalised forces have always been problematic anyway.

do you think in true libertarian socialism institutions wouldn't exist? is being pacifistic anarchist futile?

[: //]

---